Why this report matters

Circle surged 35% following its Q4 2025 earnings release, but the magnitude of the move was not driven purely by the headline numbers. The real catalyst was positioning. Hedge funds had built sizable short exposure into the print, and as we highlighted in our February 20, 2026 Market Updates report, the setup pointed to a high-probability short squeeze rather than a fundamental re-rating. We explicitly projected a strong rebound in Circle shares.

In a follow-up report on February 21, 2026, we further highlighted Circle as one of our “Top Charts,” noting it as a key beneficiary of the rapid asset accumulation in the IQMM Genius Money Market ETF, which raised $18 billion in just a few days. The speed and scale of those inflows materially strengthened the bullish setup. As a result, we were unequivocally pounding the table on Circle’s asymmetric upside risk throughout the week, ahead of the 35% explosive move.

Below, we break down why the moves were so violent, not just in Circle, but also in Coinbase and Bitcoin. While Circle was a clearly flagged bullish setup (a call that alone would have more than paid for a 10x Research subscription), the magnitude of the reaction was driven by positioning dynamics across the broader crypto complex. Importantly, another catalyst is approaching that could reset the narrative, after which markets are likely to refocus and trade more squarely on fundamentals.

Circle (LHS) - Is this the breakout to load up?

Main arguments

Our conviction was not based on earnings speculation, but on a confluence of signals: the acceleration in USDC minting activity, improving USDC trading volumes, and a constructive technical structure. These confirmation points suggested that downside risk was crowded while upside convexity was underpriced. Having traded for hedge funds and run them ourselves, we understand that when shorts accumulate at poor levels, the unwind can be violent.

That is precisely how we positioned into the event. Circle surged from $62 to $83, and the intraday price action was characteristic of institutional short covering rather than incremental long-only accumulation. The velocity of the move, the absence of orderly consolidation, and the magnitude of the gap higher all pointed to forced buying. This was a positioning-driven rally, anticipated, structured for, and executed accordingly.

Upside convexity was clearly present, amplified by the significant upside call exposure that traders had accumulated, a dynamic we explicitly identified as a potential catalyst for a sharp rally. Once the squeeze began, that optionality accelerated the move. The CRCL Feb 27 ’26 $80 call surged from $0.06 to $4.50 in a single session, a gain of approximately 4,900%, with nearly 21,000 contracts trading. This was not incremental positioning; it was explosive repricing driven by gamma and forced flows, reinforcing the magnitude and speed of the upside move.

Since its listing in June 2025, Circle has attracted a growing short base. Over the past six months, approximately 14.4% of the float was sold short, with the majority of that exposure, roughly 10% of shares outstanding, established since mid-December. Importantly, those positions were initiated at an average price near $72.

Short Sell Ratio by Hedge Funds Last 6 Months (Circle most shorted)

At current levels, that implies roughly $860 million in short exposure underwater, helping explain the violence of the squeeze. By our estimates, hedge funds lost approximately $500 million in mark-to-market terms during yesterday’s short-covering rally alone, a classic example of crowded positioning unwinding under positive catalyst pressure.

Similarly, Coinbase shares advanced 13%, reflecting its economic linkage to Circle through both an equity stake and a revenue-sharing agreement tied to USDC. As Circle squeezed higher, short covering and positive sentiment spilled over into Coinbase, amplifying the move.

We recently shifted to a more constructive stance on Coinbase, stating in our February 15 Crypto Stocks Trading Strategy report: “We believe Coinbase should trade closer to $200–220 rather than $164.” At the time, downside risks were already reflected in muted trading volumes and compressed sentiment. Trading volumes began to increase even as the shares hovered near their lows, creating a narrow tactical window for asymmetric upside.

Coinbase (LHS) vs. Crypto Trading Volumes (RHS, $ billions)

While this implied roughly 20% upside from those levels, we remain measured in our broader outlook. We expect trading activity to remain relatively subdued over the next one to three months, which should cap the probability of a sustained structural rerating. Accordingly, this represents a tactical opportunity rather than a long-term bullish call, with a current preference for selectively positioned crypto equities over the underlying cryptocurrencies themselves.

This week’s moves were largely driven by positioning rather than a shift in fundamentals. It remains premature, in our view, to conclude that a structural low is in place. The volatility in Circle and Coinbase reflected positioning dynamics more than earnings or fundamental developments, and Bitcoin’s sharp swings followed the same pattern.

While we assigned a 40–50% probability that Bitcoin could trade toward $60,000 by Friday, prices approached $62,900 on February 24 when US stocks opened, before reversing. Improved sentiment in the U.S. technology sector sparked a broader equity rebound (AMD +9% after a $100 billion deal with Meta), which in turn supported Bitcoin. Notably, the same positioning imbalances that accelerated the initial downside also accelerated the subsequent rebound. With NVIDIA earnings acting as a potential upside catalyst, Bitcoin short covering accelerated as traders were forced to adjust their gamma exposure and rebalance hedges.

On February 6, negative Bitcoin gamma was already present but more distributed across strikes. By February 26, negative gamma became significantly more concentrated, particularly in the $65k–$71k region, with deeper pockets of short gamma exposure. Bitcoin is currently trading around $68,000, squarely within a concentrated short gamma pocket that has formed between roughly $65,000 and $71,000. Compared to earlier in the month, gamma exposure has become more clustered and directional, increasing the market’s mechanical sensitivity to price moves.

Bitcoin Gamma Exposure: Feb 6 vs. Feb 26 - excessive volatility sub-$70k

When dealers are short gamma, they are forced to sell into weakness and buy into strength, amplifying momentum rather than dampening it. This means that if Bitcoin drifts lower toward $65,000, hedging flows could accelerate downside pressure (and vice versa), particularly if key strikes are breached. Gamma does not determine direction, but it materially increases the speed and magnitude of moves once momentum builds.

Conclusion

Importantly, short gamma cuts both ways. If Bitcoin were to fall toward $62,000 and then stabilize, a reversal higher could trigger dealer re-hedging in the opposite direction. As prices rise, short gamma dealers would need to buy back futures to rebalance their deltas, potentially fueling a reflexive rebound.

In other words, while the current structure increases the risk of sharp downside acceleration, it also creates the conditions for a fast recovery rally if selling exhausts and price reclaims key levels (notably the $67,000-$70,000 area). In this environment, positioning, not just fundamentals, is likely to dictate the next large move.

The bulk of short Bitcoin gamma is set to roll off on Friday, February 27, which should meaningfully reduce the mechanical distortions currently influencing price action. As this positioning clears, the market is likely to trade more “cleanly,” with less forced hedging flow amplifying intraday volatility. Consequently, the risk of both an exaggerated upside squeeze and a sharp, gamma-driven downside acceleration should diminish materially.

This week’s volatility has been largely driven by positioning dynamics, particularly in the options market. As that exposure rolls off and resets, the structural backdrop will shift meaningfully, and the forces driving price action are likely to look very different in the days ahead. From a technical perspective, a sustained move back above $70,000 would materially improve the structure and could signal the early stages of a bottoming process. We will address this potential inflection point (if it is one) and the conditions required to confirm it in greater detail in an upcoming report.

Disclaimer: This email and any attached research are for informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any assets. 10x Research does not provide personalized investment advice and is not registered as a broker-dealer or investment adviser. Views are the authors’ own and subject to change. Please consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions. ©10x Research.